Are you a Euprera member?
Sign in / Sign up
Forgot your password?
News and info > News from EUPRERA
News from EUPRERA
News from Euprera president 2012-2013
News from Euprera president 2010-2011
Which English?
Members’ Conversations
Members' Books

News from EUPRERA

News RSS feed

European Communication Monitor 2011 - 01.07.2011
Results published, free download of charts

The new edition of the European Communication Monitor, the most comprehensive study in the field of public relations and communication management worldwide, paints an ambiguous picture on the status of the profession. The results released today by the European Public Relations Education and Research Association (EUPRERA) and the European Association of Communication Directors (EACD) show that most communication professionals have a broad level of responsibilities and direct access to the top management level. However, only a minority believe that they generate financial and immaterial assets for their organisations. Decision making is rational rather than risk-taking, which contrasts with their counterparts in the United States.

Findings of the European Communication Monitor 2011 are based on replies from 2,209 senior professionals based in 43 countries. The annual survey is conducted by a research group of professors from renowned universities in 11 countries, led by Professor Dr. Ansgar Zerfass, Germany. The research has been supported by the media monitoring company Infopaq as well as Grayling, the world’s second largest independent public relations consultancy. A free PDF report (139 pages) with the results is available at

Some of the key findings are:

– Power of communication departments: The communication function has gained influence in Europe: In three out of four organisations it is taken seriously by senior management and likely to be involved in planning organisational strategies. Communication professionals are getting access to the top management in organisations with 18 per cent being board members and 60 per cent reporting directly to the CEO. But this hierarchical power is not necessarily mirrored in close relationships with other organisational functions: Collaboration with internal strategy units is rather weak and only a minority (48 per cent) of the communication professionals believe that their department generates financial and immaterial assets for the organisation. However, communication has extended its function beyond generating publicity and managing media relations: In eight out of ten organisations the communication department is responsible for communicating with a wide range of stakeholders such as the media, consumers, employees, investors, or politicians.

– Role enactment and decision making: 68 per cent of the surveyed practitioners identify themselves with the advanced ‘strategic facilitator’ role, meaning they not only support organisational goals by executing communication, but also help to define business strategies. This number has risen by ten per cent over the last two years. The enhanced role for communicators brings up new challenges for job-related decision making. A large majority (85 per cent) report that they make a thorough evaluation of the situation based on all available information before taking decisions in their job. 68 per cent think it is useful to rely on best practices used by similar organisations, but only a minority (45 per cent) take risks when making decisions.

Credibility of public relations: 42 per cent of the survey participants regard the term ‘public relations’ (PR) as a discredited label for the profession. A reason for this might be the poor media image of the term and the practice: 42 per cent of the communication professionals report on negative connotations of PR in the mass media. As a consequence, many respondents favour alternative labels, such as ‘corporate communications’ (68 per cent), ‘strategic communication’ (61 per cent) and ‘communication management’ (56 per cent).

ROI of communication: Although every second surveyed practitioner claims to use the term ‘return on investment’ (ROI) to evaluate communication activities, many are still lacking basic knowledge about the concept: 47 per cent did not agree with the standard definition of ROI as the ratio of financial profit resulting from an activity against its actual cost, and only 38 per cent knew that it has to be defined in monetary terms.

Strategic issues and trust: The survey identifies two main issues relevant in the next years: ‘Coping with the digital evolution and the social web’ continues to be the most important issue according to 55 per cent of the communication professionals. 44 per cent identified ‘linking communication efforts with business goals’ as an on-going challenge for the communication function. ‘Building and maintaining trust’ has lost ground as a hot issue for communication practitioners, but it is important to note that 93 per cent claim they want to enhance trust in the organisation and/or its brands rather than in leaders or businesses at large.

Development of disciplines and channels: Corporate communication continues to have the leading role, followed by marketing and consumer communication. Online instruments are expected to lead the media mix utilised by communication management in the near future. However, a longitudinal analysis reveals that professionals tend to overestimate the growth of disciplines and especially online channels.

Social media governance and skills and activities: Even though professionals expect social media channels to grow even more, adequate management and governance structures are still underdeveloped: Only four out of ten professionals working in communication departments report the existence of social media guidelines and no more than every third organisation has established tools for monitoring the social web. Furthermore, social media skills of communication professionals such as initiating web-based dialogues or knowing the legal framework for social media are poorly understood and developed.

Future qualification needs and training: The top five future qualification needs and knowledge areas are the effects of traditional and new media (named by 83 per cent), relationship building (82 per cent) and communication technologies (80 per cent), followed by hands-on skills such as public speaking/presenting (79 per cent) and coaching (75 per cent). A comparison between the needs identified and the training programmes offered by organisations today reveals a large gap in every field.

About the organisers

The European Public Relations Education and Research Association (Euprera) is an autonomous organisation, with members from more than 30 countries, that aims at stimulating and promoting the knowledge and practice of communication management in Europe. Academic scholars and experienced practitioners work together to advance fundamental and applied research. More information is available at:

The European Association of Communication Directors (EACD) is the leading network for communication professionals across Europe with more than 1,600 members. The non-partisan association lobbies for the profession, establishes common quality standards and promotes the advancement of professional qualification by organising events and providing services and materials. More information is available at:

Bd du Jubilé 71, bte 3
1080 Brussels
VAT code 0478953039
designed and developed by NIC