#EUPRERAtalks – Responsibility in Strategic Communication: Truth or Trap?
Responsibility in Strategic Communication: Truth or Trap?
Date and Time:
Tuesday, 13 May 2025
2:00 PM (CEST)
What to expect from the webinar
In this webinar, Petra Koudelková discusses with Ganga Dhanesh, Wim Elving, Denisa Hejlová, and Samira Rahimi Mavi, scholars with expertise in strategic communication and the multiple facets of responsibility. The webinar reflects on their research recently published in the new EUPRERA book, Responsibility in Strategic Communication: Truth or Trap?, the latest volume in the Advances in Public Relations and Communication Management (APCRM) series, published by Emerald.
The webinar thus provides a unique forum for discussing not only the insights related to contributions presented at the EUPRERA Congress held in Prague, 2023, but it also offers a view on how experts perceive current legal and political development in corporate social responsibility, diversity, equity, inclusion, sustainability, and ESG. Government authorities in the USA have started to change their discursive practices, and EU regulatory bodies are talking about a redefinition of plans for extensive ESG reporting. Based on their previous findings, the EUPRERA experts share their view on how this structural change will contribute to differentiating genuine commitment from mere promises of responsibility.
Speakers

Ganga Dhanesh, University of Maryland, USA
Ganga Dhanesh (PhD, National University of Singapore) is an Associate Professor of Public Relations in the Department of Communication at the University of Maryland. Her experience in the corporate sector has informed her extensive research on corporate social responsibility communication, internal communication, and strategic public relations across global contexts, published in multiple top journals. Dr. Dhanesh serves as Associate Editor for the Journal of Communication Management and is on the editorial board of Business Horizons, Journal of Public Relations Research, and Public Relations Review. A recipient of several research awards, Dhanesh consults for various national and multinational organizations.
Wim J.L. Elving, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, the Netherlands
Wim J.L. Elving is a Professor of Sustainable Communication at the Hanze University of Applied Sciences (HUAS), Groningen, the Netherlands. He is part of EnTranCe, Centre of Expertise: Energy of the HUAS, that focusses on the Energy Transition and the Sustainable Society. Elving’s current research is involved with communicative and behavioral interventions to create this sustainable future. Elving has contributed more than 250 articles, book chapters, books, editorials, blogs, etcetera. His research expertise is in sustainable communications, corporate communication, internal and change communication, CSR communication and branding. He was (2022) awarded the EUPRERA distinguished scholar award and is a member of the A.W. Page Society, and EUPRERA.
Denisa Hejlová, Charles University, Czech Republic
Denisa Hejlová is an Associate Professor at Charles University in Prague and a leading Czech expert in strategic communication, public relations, and political communication. She served as Head of the Department of Marketing Communication and Public Relations from 2011 to 2023 and currently directs the university’s Research Centre for Strategic Communication. A Fulbright Visiting Scholar at Columbia University in 2014, Dr. Hejlová also studied intercultural communication at Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. In 2020, she launched the first Czech MA programme in Strategic Communication. Her research spans government communication, propaganda, influencer ethics, and trust management. She is a member of EUPRERA and a contributor to the European Communication Monitor.
Samira Rahimi Mavi, University of Vienna, Austria
Samira Rahimi Mavi studied journalism at Allameh Tabataba’i University in Tehran and earned her PhD in communication from the University of Vienna, where she worked under the guidance of Prof. Sabine Einwiller. Her research explores corporate communication, with a focus on media coverage, consumer criticism, diversity and inclusion, and ethical communication strategies on controversial issues.
Moderator: Petra Koudelková, Charles University, Czech Republic
Dr Petra Koudelková is the Head of the Department of Marketing Communication and PR, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague. Her field of study is sustainable marketing, social marketing, and marketing of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). She is very interested in government communication. She leads the working group for implementing a sustainability program for the whole Faculty of Social Sciences. She is an expert in the communication of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities and maps the phenomenon of greenwashing in rapidly changing market conditions.
Duration
1 hour
info@euprera.org
Facebook
YouTube


This paper provides a state-of-the-art overview of an important area that is less studied, investor relations and financial communication. It uses a bibliometric approach that draws on big data analysis and opportunities for different forms of analysis that technology/AI allows. Through the historical review, it nicely positions itself in relation to previous literature, highlighting similarities, differences, and relationships. It is a well-designed and methodologically sound interdisciplinary paper that significantly contributes to the under-developed study of investor relations and financial communication as part of strategic communication.




This paper significantly contributes to the realm of public affairs by providing valuable insights into how politicians and lobbyists in Norway use the concept of public interest to advocate for or against energy and environmental issues. The paper is well constructed, rigorous and well-argued. It offers a comprehensive, relevant, and coherent theoretical framework that thoroughly examines the utilization of “topos” in the communicative interactions of these influential social actors. The theoretical framework is highly valuable in that it can be used to analyze a diverse set of advocacy initiatives beyond the ones in focus in this study. Overall, this study constitutes a significant advancement in the understanding of lobbyism and rhetoric within the political sphere and offers a theory-driven tool to dissect the quality of argumentations of those in power and the role of communication in affecting democratic processes.
This paper explores the frequently used, yet ambiguously defined concept of VUCA, aiming to provide a conceptual and empirical analysis that sheds light on its impact on strategic communication and outlines effective responses to its challenges. The study is backed by qualitative data gathered in Austria. A commendable aspect of this research is the authors’ intention to enhance our comprehension of VUCA while contributing to the theoretical understanding of current public relations in both internal and external environments. To aid professionals in navigating complex and volatile situations, the paper introduces a valuable tool called the VUCA RADAR. Overall, the study stands out as an intriguing, innovative, pertinent, and ambitious contribution to the field.
This paper proposes an integrative approach for future research in public relations and communication management. The methodological approach integrates insights from research developments in society, management, and technology and integrates insights from professionals. There is a nice dialectical engagement between theory and practice-based experiences which positions this work as one highly commented for its practical implications and contribution in expanding our knowledge for conducting formative research. Overall, the paper suggests an innovative integrative methodological perspective, that can become an important practical toolkit for professionals and their research efforts in identifying key trends.
Dr. Johnson’s review stands at an exceptional level of quality. Her feedback is thorough, comprising in-depth and comprehensive comments, along with practical suggestions that effectively aid authors in enhancing their papers. Notably, her constructive and encouraging remarks prompt authors to introspect on their arguments and research decisions. Moreover, the review exhibits attentive feedback and a profound respect for diverse academic cultural traditions and perspectives, making it truly commendable.
