Call for Papers: 2025 EUPRERA Annual Congress in Lund
2025 EUPRERA Congress will be titled: “At the Intersection between Academia and Practice in Public Relations and Strategic Communication”.
HOST UNIVERSITY
The host university will be Lund University, in Sweden, founded in 1666 and one of the world’s top 100 universities. The University has approximately 45,000 students and 8,600 staff based in Lund, Helsingborg, Malmö, and Ljungbyhed.
Lund University’s Department of Communication is one of the largest units in Europe dedicated to strategic communication and has more students, lecturers, and researchers than any other department in Sweden in the field of strategic communication and includes education and research in the closely related disciplines of media and communication studies and journalism.
THE THEME
The XXVI EUPRERA Congress invites academics, researchers, and professionals in the field of communication to an interdisciplinary discussion on public relations (PR) and strategic communication concerning the relationships between academia, practice, and impact.
The reality becomes increasingly fluid, complex, unpredictable, paradoxical, and full of tensions. Thus, integrating academia and practice is critical for addressing and dealing with complex, “wicked problems” and grand societal challenges. Collaboration between academia and practice may also be a solution to address the need for alternative or improved approaches to organising, leading, and communicating.
However, such collaboration is not without difficulties. A strong dualism differentiates practitioners from researchers, means from ends, and thought from actions. This dualism cements the distance between practice and research, reducing the possibilities for impact and change.
Further, knowledge co-production needs facilitation and does not happen by itself.
CALL FOR PAPERS
The organisers of the EUPRERA congress in Lund welcome theoretical, empirical, and applied research on the congress theme and are looking forward to stimulating discussions in different thematic areas and an additional open track. Interested authors should submit short-length or fulllength papers or panel proposals in one of the track options. Abstract submissions will not be reviewed and will be automatically disqualified.
CONGRESS TRACKS
TRACK ONE: Strategic Communication and Societal Impact
TRACK TWO: Co-Creating Knowledge
TRACK THREE: Turning Critical Research into Practice
TRACK FOUR: The Future of Strategic Communication and Public Relations – Professionals in a digital and AI-driven World
OPEN TRACK
EDUCATION TRACK
THREE TYPES OF SUBMISSIONS ARE POSSIBLE:
- Short-length paper (double-blind review).
- Full-length research paper (double-blind review).
- Panel proposal.
IMPORTANT DEADLINES
March 31 – Submission deadline
May 30 – Feedback to authors
June 30 – Full program released
August 25 – Submission of the final full paper
AWARDS
Five prizes are awarded yearly at the Congress. Our winners not only promote themselves and their institutions but their work celebrates the excellence and innovation in learning and research that EUPRERA stands for.
During the 2025 Congress the following recognitions will be awarded.
EUPRERA Annual Best Paper Awards
EUPRERA Best Reviewer
EUPRERA PhD Award for Excellent Doctoral Thesis
EUPRERA Master Thesis Award for Excellence
Deadline for applications: March 15, 2025.
CONTACT
e-mail: congress2025@euprera.org
VENUE
AF-Borgen Sandgatan 2 223 50 Lund, Sweden www.afborgen.se
More info will be disclosed on the submission and registration platform, coming soon.
Read the Complete Call for Papers and contributions

info@euprera.org
Facebook
YouTube


This paper provides a state-of-the-art overview of an important area that is less studied, investor relations and financial communication. It uses a bibliometric approach that draws on big data analysis and opportunities for different forms of analysis that technology/AI allows. Through the historical review, it nicely positions itself in relation to previous literature, highlighting similarities, differences, and relationships. It is a well-designed and methodologically sound interdisciplinary paper that significantly contributes to the under-developed study of investor relations and financial communication as part of strategic communication.






This paper significantly contributes to the realm of public affairs by providing valuable insights into how politicians and lobbyists in Norway use the concept of public interest to advocate for or against energy and environmental issues. The paper is well constructed, rigorous and well-argued. It offers a comprehensive, relevant, and coherent theoretical framework that thoroughly examines the utilization of “topos” in the communicative interactions of these influential social actors. The theoretical framework is highly valuable in that it can be used to analyze a diverse set of advocacy initiatives beyond the ones in focus in this study. Overall, this study constitutes a significant advancement in the understanding of lobbyism and rhetoric within the political sphere and offers a theory-driven tool to dissect the quality of argumentations of those in power and the role of communication in affecting democratic processes.
This paper explores the frequently used, yet ambiguously defined concept of VUCA, aiming to provide a conceptual and empirical analysis that sheds light on its impact on strategic communication and outlines effective responses to its challenges. The study is backed by qualitative data gathered in Austria. A commendable aspect of this research is the authors’ intention to enhance our comprehension of VUCA while contributing to the theoretical understanding of current public relations in both internal and external environments. To aid professionals in navigating complex and volatile situations, the paper introduces a valuable tool called the VUCA RADAR. Overall, the study stands out as an intriguing, innovative, pertinent, and ambitious contribution to the field.
This paper proposes an integrative approach for future research in public relations and communication management. The methodological approach integrates insights from research developments in society, management, and technology and integrates insights from professionals. There is a nice dialectical engagement between theory and practice-based experiences which positions this work as one highly commented for its practical implications and contribution in expanding our knowledge for conducting formative research. Overall, the paper suggests an innovative integrative methodological perspective, that can become an important practical toolkit for professionals and their research efforts in identifying key trends.
Dr. Johnson’s review stands at an exceptional level of quality. Her feedback is thorough, comprising in-depth and comprehensive comments, along with practical suggestions that effectively aid authors in enhancing their papers. Notably, her constructive and encouraging remarks prompt authors to introspect on their arguments and research decisions. Moreover, the review exhibits attentive feedback and a profound respect for diverse academic cultural traditions and perspectives, making it truly commendable.