2025 PhD and Master Thesis Award Winners – #euprera2025
The European Public Relations Education and Research Association (EUPRERA), a body of academic institutions, researchers and senior professionals in the field of public relations and strategic communication with 500 members from 40 countries, has awarded two master students for their excellent theses.
The PhD Award for Excellent Doctoral Thesis is a bi-annual prize awarded by EUPRERA, aimed at stimulating academic discussion and building the body of knowledge in communication management across Europe. The jury, headed by Winni Johansen, Aarhus University, and Wim Elving, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, selected the winning thesis:
Image Transfers in Personalised Organisational Communication: Development and Validation of the Dual Process Model of Image Transfer
by Jens Hagelstein, University of Vienna / Defended at Leipzig University
Advisor: Ansgar Zerfass, Leipzig University, Germany
The thesis stands out for its theoretical innovation, methodological depth, and strong contribution to advancing communication research. Introducing the Dual Process Model of Image Transfer (DPMIT), Dr. Hagelstein bridges psychology and public relations in a novel way, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding how individual representatives shape organisational image through personalised communication. Grounded in cognitive psychology, the model was tested through three high-quality experiments involving nearly 1,000 participants, examining affective versus cognitive, explicit versus implicit, and controlled versus automatic processes of image transfer. The empirical design demonstrates exceptional methodological rigour and a clear grasp of both theoretical and applied dimensions of communication.
The study’s insights are not only academically significant but also highly relevant for practice, showing how personalised communication can effectively influence organisational perception, even in complex, media-saturated environments.
The Master Thesis Award for Excellence is an annual prize that aims to celebrate the PR academia and the role played by European Higher Education Institutions in the evolution of knowledge in this field. The jury, headed by Martina Topić-Rutherford, from the University of Alabama, selected the winning theses in two categories:
Theoretical Impact Award
Jamile Calil Racanicci, Lund University, Sweden
Confusing lobbying with corruption? Discursive tensions relating transparency and lobbying in the EU after Qatargate
Supervisor: Camilla Nothhaft, Lund University, Sweden
In the aftermath of the Qatargate scandal, this thesis critically examines how lobbying and transparency are discursively constructed within the EU context. Drawing on Foucault and Fairclough, Racanicci employs critical discourse analysis based on interviews with lobbyists and Members of the European Parliament to explore how transparency serves both as a reputational asset and a political liability.
Reviewers highlighted the study’s “mastery of PR research” and “original and unique insights”, noting its theoretical sophistication, rich engagement with contemporary scholarship, and impressive methodological design. The thesis not only highlights tensions between lobbying, transparency, and democratic legitimacy but also offers valuable directions for policymaking and ethical regulation within EU institutions.
Practical Impact Award
Arsalan Satti, University of Stirling, UK / Pompeu Fabra University, Spain
The Second Nagorno-Karabakh War: a multi-modal critical discourse analysis of social media posts of President Ilham Aliyev and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan
Supervisor: David Rolinson, University of Stirling, UK
This thesis explores how national leaders used Facebook as a strategic communication weapon during the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War. Through multimodal critical discourse analysis of 303 posts and interviews with young citizens from Armenia and Azerbaijan, Satti reveals how digital platforms became arenas of narrative warfare, bypassing traditional media gatekeepers and amplifying polarisation.
The study’s findings highlight the long-term risks of emotional mobilisation, youth mistrust, and echo chambers while also suggesting ways to rebuild dialogue and media literacy. The jury commended the work for its methodological rigour, social relevance, and practical implications for crisis and conflict communication, describing it as “a professionally executed and impactful study on the communicative dimensions of war.”