2024 Master Thesis Awards – #euprera2024
The European Public Relations Education and Research Association (EUPRERA), a body of academic institutions, researchers and senior professionals in the field of strategic communication with more than 500 members from 51 countries has awarded two master students for their excellent theses in strategic communication.
The Master Thesis Award for Excellence is an annual prize aimed to celebrate the PR academia and the role performed by European Higher Education Institutions in the evolution of knowledge of this field. The jury, headed by Martina Topić, from the University of Alabama, selected the winning theses in two categories:
Practical Impact Award
Darejan Tsurtsumia
“Flexible Organizational Structures of the Digitally Mediated Collective Actor – A Case of the Shame Movement in Georgia”
Supervisor: Ilkin Mehrabov, Lund University, Sweden

The success of social movements is highly dependent on their sustainability, and in
their efforts to produce meaningful change, they inevitably encounter oppressive
dominant forces. The winning dissertation is entitled ‘Flexible Organizational
Structures of the Digitally Mediated Collective Actor – A Case of the Shame
Movement in Georgia’ an analyses the stages of transformation a collective actor
undergoes, from a reactionary crowd-enabled network to a more traditional social
movement and emphasises the role of strategic communicative processes and
digital technologies in the constitution of its organisational structures.
Theoretical Impact Award
Megan Rollerson
“Strategic Communication of Trustworthiness in Autonomous Systems, Machine Learning & AI”
Supervisor: Marléne Wiggill, Lund University, Sweden

Autonomous systems, machine learning and artificial intelligence are increasingly
integrated into our everyday lives at an accelerating pace. The winning dissertation
is entitled ‘Strategic Communication of Trustworthiness in Autonomous Systems,
Machine Learning & AI’ and analyses how an organisation can effectively and
strategically communicate an autonomous system’s trustworthiness before and
during a system crisis, failure or rupture and develop a framework for how strategic
communication can foster trust in the technology and support a successful
organisation-public relationship.
info@euprera.org
Facebook
YouTube




This paper significantly contributes to the realm of public affairs by providing valuable insights into how politicians and lobbyists in Norway use the concept of public interest to advocate for or against energy and environmental issues. The paper is well constructed, rigorous and well-argued. It offers a comprehensive, relevant, and coherent theoretical framework that thoroughly examines the utilization of “topos” in the communicative interactions of these influential social actors. The theoretical framework is highly valuable in that it can be used to analyze a diverse set of advocacy initiatives beyond the ones in focus in this study. Overall, this study constitutes a significant advancement in the understanding of lobbyism and rhetoric within the political sphere and offers a theory-driven tool to dissect the quality of argumentations of those in power and the role of communication in affecting democratic processes.
This paper explores the frequently used, yet ambiguously defined concept of VUCA, aiming to provide a conceptual and empirical analysis that sheds light on its impact on strategic communication and outlines effective responses to its challenges. The study is backed by qualitative data gathered in Austria. A commendable aspect of this research is the authors’ intention to enhance our comprehension of VUCA while contributing to the theoretical understanding of current public relations in both internal and external environments. To aid professionals in navigating complex and volatile situations, the paper introduces a valuable tool called the VUCA RADAR. Overall, the study stands out as an intriguing, innovative, pertinent, and ambitious contribution to the field.
This paper proposes an integrative approach for future research in public relations and communication management. The methodological approach integrates insights from research developments in society, management, and technology and integrates insights from professionals. There is a nice dialectical engagement between theory and practice-based experiences which positions this work as one highly commented for its practical implications and contribution in expanding our knowledge for conducting formative research. Overall, the paper suggests an innovative integrative methodological perspective, that can become an important practical toolkit for professionals and their research efforts in identifying key trends.
Dr. Johnson’s review stands at an exceptional level of quality. Her feedback is thorough, comprising in-depth and comprehensive comments, along with practical suggestions that effectively aid authors in enhancing their papers. Notably, her constructive and encouraging remarks prompt authors to introspect on their arguments and research decisions. Moreover, the review exhibits attentive feedback and a profound respect for diverse academic cultural traditions and perspectives, making it truly commendable.

